Talk:Liability matching

Ready for main space?--Quebec 17:18, 30 April 2018 (CDT)
 * The page is not ready for the main namespace on its own, as the reader is missing an important link to the dual-budget model. Instead, I think the set of Conventional retirement / Non-conventional retirement / Consumption smoothing pages should be moved together with Liability matching to the main namespace. The content is "good enough" - it is helpful and appears to be accurate (unless you disagree). Consider removing the Under construction templates from the retirement planning pages. Further improvements can always be made.


 * For consumption smoothing, I have added Under construction because of the excruciating detail and spreadsheet link that are needed to for the real-world calculations. This page can be moved to the main space with the template remaining.


 * Once the pages are moved, the administrative tasks to update the links, add categories, update navigation / sidebar templates, update "See also" sections can be completed.
 * --LadyGeek 21:31, 30 April 2018 (CDT)
 * Hum. Yes I see the problem with the dual budget model being still in a user page. I'd like more feedback on the Conventional retirement and Non-conventional retirement pages before they are moved to main space. Let's wait a bit, maybe P_I will review them. We can also ask for feedback on FWF later.--Quebec 08:56, 1 May 2018 (CDT)
 * The "Dual budget" internal link in "Liability matching" now points to the "Retirement budget models" user page. I think both pages can be moved to main space.--Quebec 17:57, 3 May 2018 (CDT)
 * I agree, and have moved the pages to the main namespace. The "See also" sections are empty. If there is no intent to use the sections, they can be deleted. --LadyGeek 18:52, 3 May 2018 (CDT)